Research

A Customer Just Told You ChatGPT Is Lying About Your Product — Here's What to Do

Metricus Research · April 10, 2026 · 6 min read

You are not alone, and you are not overreacting. Factual errors in AI-generated responses are common: wrong pricing, fabricated features, outdated product details presented as current. Metricus shows the answer AI gives when your customers ask for what you sell, with every business it names, and new text for your website.

How widespread is this?

The moment a customer tells you that ChatGPT is saying something wrong about your product, the instinct is to assume it is an isolated glitch. It almost never is. The errors are not subtle differences in tone or positioning. They are demonstrably wrong facts: incorrect prices, features attributed to the wrong product tier, fabricated company details that never existed, and discontinued products described as currently available.

The scale is growing in lockstep with AI adoption. ChatGPT now has over 800 million weekly users. Over 60% of consumers express high trust in AI-generated results, according to a 2026 Boston Consulting Group study. 41% of consumers have purchased a product recommended by AI in the past six months. When AI gets your brand wrong, it is not a theoretical problem — it is a live channel feeding bad information to people who are ready to buy.

Why AI gets your brand wrong

AI models do not store verified facts in an editable database. They generate responses by pattern-matching across training data and web sources. That architecture creates three failure modes for brand information.

Conflicting sources. Your pricing page says one thing. A G2 review from 18 months ago says another. A comparison blog post says a third. AI has no reliable way to determine which source is authoritative, and it frequently picks the wrong one. LLMs cite Reddit and editorial sites for over 60% of brand information — not corporate websites.

Information gaps. When AI cannot find a specific fact about your company, it does not say "I don't know." It fills the gap with a plausible-sounding fabrication. This is how brands end up with invented founding dates, fabricated employee counts, and headquarters in cities they have never operated from.

Stale training data. AI models reflect your brand as it appeared months or years ago in their training corpus. If you have changed pricing, renamed a product, or undergone a rebrand, AI may still be serving the old version to every prospect who asks about you.

The most common error patterns

These error types cluster by platform. A Industry research of hundreds of millions of prompts found Google AI Overviews is 44% more likely to display negative brand information than ChatGPT. Google AI Overviews also carries an approximately 10% error rate across all queries. ChatGPT tends toward feature conflation and fabricated details because it relies heavily on training data. Perplexity, which uses more real-time web search, tends toward outdated pricing errors because it pulls from whatever stale sources rank well.

What's actually at stake

The business impact of AI misinformation is not abstract. 35% of brands report that inaccurate AI responses have already damaged their reputation. One documented case showed hallucinated product specs caused a 25% spike in product returns. When AI tells a prospect the wrong price, it creates mismatched expectations your sales team has to correct — or the prospect walks away without ever contacting you.

The compounding effect makes this worse over time. AI hallucinations about a brand tend to persist across model updates unless actively corrected. A fabricated detail embedded in one model’s training data can propagate to newer models, to AI-generated content on third-party sites, and from there back into future training data. Without intervention, hallucinations become self-reinforcing. 85% of brands now report experiencing AI-accelerated threats, including misinformation and misrepresentation.

And there is no correction portal. You cannot contact OpenAI, Google, or Anthropic and request that specific wrong information about your brand be fixed. AI models do not work that way. Correction requires identifying which errors exist, tracing them to their sources, and fixing those sources so that future model updates reflect accurate information.

Where the errors cluster

The pattern: Companies with multiple product lines, frequent pricing changes, or recent rebrands have the highest hallucination rates. Brands with limited web presence outside their own domain have higher fabrication rates because AI fills information gaps with plausible-sounding but invented details. The error rate also increases with brand complexity — and the errors are rarely confined to a single platform.

The cross-platform pattern matters most. A pricing error that appears on ChatGPT often shows up on other AI platforms too. This means the customer who told you ChatGPT got something wrong is probably only seeing part of the picture. Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Google AI Overviews may all be serving their own versions of misinformation about your brand, each sourced from different places, each wrong in different ways.

75% of marketing teams now use AI, according to Salesforce — yet most lack a formal process to verify what AI says about their own brand. The brands that discover the problem are the lucky ones. The ones who never check never know why their lead quality shifted or why prospects arrive with wrong expectations.

The case for auditing before acting

The instinct after that panicked customer call is to start fixing things immediately — update your website copy, rewrite your FAQ, publish a blog post correcting the record. That instinct is understandable but premature. Without knowing exactly what AI gets wrong about your brand, which platforms have which errors, and which sources feed the misinformation, you are guessing at solutions.

Start with the complete picture: every factual error across the major AI platforms, traced to its likely source. That is the prerequisite to any correction strategy that actually works — because the fix for a pricing error sourced from a stale G2 listing is completely different from the fix for a fabricated detail with no source at all.

Last updated: September 2026

Frequently asked questions

Why does ChatGPT say wrong things about my company?

AI models like ChatGPT generate responses by pattern-matching across training data and web sources. When your brand information is inconsistent across third-party sites, review platforms, and directories, AI picks the wrong version. Information gaps get filled with plausible-sounding fabrications. Stale training data reflects your company as it was months or years ago. The result is confident-sounding misinformation.

How common are AI errors about brands?

They are widespread. The most common errors are wrong pricing from stale review sites, feature conflation across product tiers, fabricated company details, and outdated information about discontinued products. A pricing error on one AI platform often shows up on others too.

Can I contact OpenAI to fix what ChatGPT says about my brand?

No. There is no official correction portal at OpenAI, Google, or Anthropic where you can request changes to what AI says about your brand. AI models do not store facts in an editable database. Correction requires an indirect strategy: auditing which errors exist, identifying which sources feed them, and fixing those sources so future model updates reflect accurate information.

How do I find out what AI is getting wrong about my company?

Check what the major AI platforms say about your brand when asked the questions your buyers ask. Flag every factual error, note which platforms repeat it, and trace each to its likely source.

Does wrong AI information actually affect my business?

Yes. 41% of consumers have purchased a product recommended by AI in the past six months. Over 60% of consumers express high trust in AI-generated results. When AI tells a prospect the wrong price, wrong features, or recommends a competitor instead, it directly impacts revenue. One documented case showed hallucinated product specs caused a 25% spike in returns.

Cite as: Metricus — A Customer Just Told You ChatGPT Is Lying About Your Product — Here's What to Do

What do your customers ask AI?